Mon premier blog

Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong by J. L. Mackie

Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong J. L. Mackie ebook
Format: djvu
Publisher:
ISBN: 0140135588, 9780140135589
Page: 242

Future Imperfect: Technology and Freedom in an Uncertain World. Inventing Right and Wrong, Penguin 1990. 42, … the tendency to read our feelings into their objects. Written by a number of people, not just philosophers: Robert Wright's The Moral Animal, Mackie's Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong, even T. €�If he says that objective moral value is the same as God's attitudes, that's divine command theory. It really depends who the list is for. An introduction to Ethics., OUP 1992. (1977), Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong, Harmondsworth: Penguin. Thus we have every reason not to believe in them. This Solum post deals with a new paper available on SSRN dealing with Mackie's Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong, which I read during my undergraduate days as a philosophy major at the University. A., Textbook of Christian Ethics, T & T Clark 1989. For relevant contemporary work, see Mackie's works, Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong or Hume's Moral Theory. Also his book “Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong” is good but probably only the first few chapters are worth reading (it's metaethics not ethics… that's my excuse). Is this similar to what Mackie calls the pathetic fallacy in Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong? As morality goes, they would have to be very weird facts. [3] See, of course, in particular Mackie, J.L. Ethics : Inventing Right and Wrong. I remember, today, only one of those contributions: “Rule Egoism,” a short note that dovetailed nicely with J.L. Similarly, I think that Donagan (The Theory of Morality) and Mackie (Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong) make crucial points in ethical theory, although these points are too rarely grasped by other philosophers. Mackie, Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong, 1977.